DRAFT REVIEW OF SYSTEM SECURITY IN THE TOWN OF FLORENCE Florence
, 6 April 2009 there
All 'Ass Employment Policy, Riccardo Nencini .
The Chairman of the Municipal Council, Eros Cruccolini.
the President of the Commission for Employment Issues and Labour, Leonardo Pieri. At
MSW Coordinator, Mauro Comi.
the Director of Organization Department, Dr. Sarina Liga.
The General Manager, Dott.Carlo Paolini.
pc and the Director of the Central Service for Protection, Ing.Guido Bianchi. At
Pisll of Florence.
workers in the City of Florence.
Today, the RLS of the City of Florence gathered to examine the proposed restructuring of the security company town, which was submitted on March 17 showed us
A first consideration concerns the method by which it came to ' project development, there is at least it seemed surprising that after years in which the RLS were alone in the wilderness to cry out the need to revise the structure of the security applied to the City, which showed long been obvious shortcomings and dysfunctions of a sudden, within just a few days, there we are seen to convene and bring together to assist the illustration of a project, we were told, must be approved by resolution of the junta over a month, for obvious reasons institutions. We would perhaps expect to be consulted in advance, perhaps by participating in the work table in which we could explain our proposals based on years of experience and knowledge from the company of those who work. In each If the impression that you received in that meeting was very low, if not zero, the margins for action on a project that interested in that forum, perhaps the most ratifuca that the cooperation of RLS.
With regard to content it seems that the project creates more problems than intended to solve.
First, there appears to contain elements of extreme contradiction. For example, it left intact the two learned of the 9:15 p.m. Directions, albeit with completely different motivations for everyone, while others are set to zero: however, if he heard of the Police Station is "saved" having shown good function and structure, not understand why is not taken as a model for other Departments, rather than leave it as a white fly in a completely different future.
It is also considered that the proposed model contains some predictions desperately at odds with the current legislation, the most obvious of which are still only as an example, the designation of ReSePP contrary to the provisions of joint artt.2, let.h, e17 , Com.1 of DLgs.81/08.
down on a practical level it seems chaotic situation that would arise with the implementation of the project presented to us: we just tried to imagine finding the right partner for both RLS and for individual workers, as to every employer does not match one ReSePP nor any SEPP is a relative Employer.
From a simple count (error-prone) was noted from the current total of about 78 employees in the various SSePP around the town, many of whom are full time, goes to about 17. The only logic that seems to oversee such a large downsizing seems to be that of savings, which is surely the only one that RLS can not accept. While it is acceptable and even desirable rationalization of resources in order to avoid waste, we strongly oppose a reduction in resources for the safety recall in this field has been shown that an apparent immediate savings results in the medium to long term in an extra cost.
Of course it is very difficult in a few lines to express an opinion on a project as articulated without running the risk of appearing biased against closed or pretext, so the RLS reiterate, in view of the collaborative design of their role, all the available a direct comparison with anyone interested in their views known and to explain their ideas in any location on the structure of the system security.
I RLS of Florence
Luca Stefano Sieni
Flaunt
Cucchiarini
Alessandro Stefano Paul Quaglia
Baldini Alessandro Guidotti
Marco Conti Enrico Cipolat
Iliana Cicci
Marco Vivoli
First, there appears to contain elements of extreme contradiction. For example, it left intact the two learned of the 9:15 p.m. Directions, albeit with completely different motivations for everyone, while others are set to zero: however, if he heard of the Police Station is "saved" having shown good function and structure, not understand why is not taken as a model for other Departments, rather than leave it as a white fly in a completely different future.
It is also considered that the proposed model contains some predictions desperately at odds with the current legislation, the most obvious of which are still only as an example, the designation of ReSePP contrary to the provisions of joint artt.2, let.h, e17 , Com.1 of DLgs.81/08.
down on a practical level it seems chaotic situation that would arise with the implementation of the project presented to us: we just tried to imagine finding the right partner for both RLS and for individual workers, as to every employer does not match one ReSePP nor any SEPP is a relative Employer.
From a simple count (error-prone) was noted from the current total of about 78 employees in the various SSePP around the town, many of whom are full time, goes to about 17. The only logic that seems to oversee such a large downsizing seems to be that of savings, which is surely the only one that RLS can not accept. While it is acceptable and even desirable rationalization of resources in order to avoid waste, we strongly oppose a reduction in resources for the safety recall in this field has been shown that an apparent immediate savings results in the medium to long term in an extra cost.
Of course it is very difficult in a few lines to express an opinion on a project as articulated without running the risk of appearing biased against closed or pretext, so the RLS reiterate, in view of the collaborative design of their role, all the available a direct comparison with anyone interested in their views known and to explain their ideas in any location on the structure of the system security.
I RLS of Florence
Luca Stefano Sieni
Flaunt
Cucchiarini
Alessandro Stefano Paul Quaglia
Baldini Alessandro Guidotti
Marco Conti Enrico Cipolat
Iliana Cicci
Marco Vivoli
